🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Significant Sum in Compensation from Clearing House Regarding Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step is a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine. The Legal Claim According to reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand. EU leaders will decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and financial stability. Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth. A Clash Over Legality European Union authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Strategic Positioning In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States." The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions. Legal Hurdles Ahead While judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm. European Safeguards European authorities indicated they are developing measures to deter other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation." How the Funding Would Work Under the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected. Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing conflict. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful message that if you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."